Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option

[Francis Dupont]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   In terms of the API (and IP_RECVDSTOPTS in particular) we can presumably
   satisfy both of you by saying that the content of the IP_RECVDSTOPTS ancillary
   data item, when it contains is a home address option, has the address
   field in the home address option set to the care of address i.e. the
   source address of the packet when it arrived.
   
=> the API is fine but the mobility draft doesn't specify how to compute
the AH message digest (mandatory if there is a binding update too).
   
   Should we put this in rfc2292bis?
   
=> It should be in the mobility RFC but if it is not in it then RFC 2292bis
is a good place.
Note that in fact there is no real usage for it for common correspondents
(ie. this has a low priority).

Thanks   

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------