>>>>> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 05:01:38 +0900,
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Specifying a
>> particular interface by the sin6_scope_id field seems to me
>> overspecification, if the scope is wider than interface (i.e. link or
>> broader scopes).
>> => to (over)specify an interface is better for emission, for reception
> I don't think it is not necessarily a better thing.
Sorry, the wording was wrong here. My intention was
"I think it is not necessarily a better thing."
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- rfc2553bis comments Dave Thaler
- Re: rfc2553bis comments Francis Dupont
- Re: rfc2553bis comments JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: rfc2553bis comments Francis Dupont
- Re: rfc2553bis comments Dave Thaler
- Re: rfc2553bis commen... Francis Dupont
- Re: rfc2553bis comments JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: rfc2553bis commen... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: rfc2553bis commen... Francis Dupont
- Re: rfc2553bis co... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: rfc2553bis comments Richard Draves
- Re: rfc2553bis comments Francis Dupont
- Re: rfc2553bis comments Yves Legrandgerard
- FW: rfc2553bis comments Dave Thaler
- RE: rfc2553bis comments Richard Draves
- RE: rfc2553bis comments Tim Hartrick
- RE: rfc2553bis comments Dave Thaler
- Re: rfc2553bis comments Francis Dupont
