Re: New "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture" draft

[Erik Nordmark]

>       please refer to draft-itojun-ipv6-transition-abuse-01.txt, specifically
>       section 3.  my suggestion is to forbid IPv4 mapped address in the IPv6
>       headers, and remove ambiguity from the dual use.

Itojun,

The implication of your recommendation is that we remove SIIT (at least
as currently specified) from the RFC directories, since the SIIT RFC
assumes that IPv4-mapped addresses can be sent in IPv6 headers and SIIT
can't work without this.

Is this really what you are proposing?

   Erik

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------