>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 08:46:37 -0400,
>>>>> "Brian Haberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Yes, it is equivalent to the "local scope" defined in
> RFC 2365 and RFC 2730. It should be noted that those documents
> refer to IPv6 scope 3 currently, but will need to be changed
> to scope 4.
I see. Then I'd like to ask how large the admin-local scope is. Is
there any relationship between other scopes?
In fact, draft-ietf-ipngwg-scoping-arch-01.txt says as follows:
o for multicast scopes, scopes with lesser values in the
"scop" subfield of the multicast address [RFC 2373,
section 2.7] are smaller than scopes with greater values,
with node-local being the smallest and global being the
According to this description, admin-local is larger than link-local
and smaller than site-local. Is my understanding correct? And if so,
is the definition really reasonable? (Although it depends on the
definition of "site").
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
