This is about what I expected, what I didn't like though was:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:31:11AM +0900, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI wrote:
> Platform: Linux
> Version: 2.2.16
> Comment: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (aka potato), tested on cerberus.
> Tester: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> starting tests, socktype = SOCK_DGRAM
> loop4 then map4
> bind socket for 127.0.0.1/12345
> bind socket for ::ffff:127.0.0.1/12345
> map4 then loop4
> bind socket for ::ffff:127.0.0.1/12345
> bind socket for 127.0.0.1/12345
> failed bind for 127.0.0.1/12345, Address already in use
I think the first one should fail as well. Anyone disagree?
Stig
--
Stig Venaas
UNINETT
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
