In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:47:40 +0200), 
Stig Ven�s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:

> This is about what I expected, what I didn't like though was:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:31:11AM +0900, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI wrote:
> > Platform: Linux
> > Version: 2.2.16
> > Comment: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (aka potato), tested on cerberus.
> > Tester: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > starting tests, socktype = SOCK_DGRAM
> > loop4 then map4
> >     bind socket for 127.0.0.1/12345
> >     bind socket for ::ffff:127.0.0.1/12345
> > map4 then loop4
> >     bind socket for ::ffff:127.0.0.1/12345
> >     bind socket for 127.0.0.1/12345
> >     failed bind for 127.0.0.1/12345, Address already in use
> 
> I think the first one should fail as well. Anyone disagree?

This seems a bug in bind checking code (ipv4->::ffff.ipv4 case)).
I'm trying to fix this.

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Web Page: http://www.ecei.tohoku.ac.jp/%7Eyoshfuji/
PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515  1323 1806 A96F 5700 6B25 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to