> Why shouldn't an address be in the DNS? In the renumbering scenario they were discussing, you'd switch your DNS entries from the old address to the new address at the start of the transition period. So the old (deprecated) address wouldn't be in the DNS. > And how can you tell that an address, deprecated for your > particular instance, has not been re-issued and is valid > for some other system? Because the old prefix wouldn't be released back for reassignment until the end of transition period. > --bill -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Richard Draves
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound ... Matt Crawford
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Richard Draves
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Richard Draves
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Bill Manning
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound ... Matt Crawford
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Brian Zill
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound ... Bill Manning
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Richard Draves
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP itojun
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Robert Elz
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Bill Manning
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Richard Draves
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Erik Nordmark
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound TCP itojun
