jinmei suggested that it may be better to send TCP RST with deprecated
source, as it will help clients to try the next available address
(on getaddrinfo chain, or something). i tend to agree.
So do I, if you can somehow be confident that your old RRSET of
addresses has propagated. (Or if you have preferred addresses that
were already in the older RRSET.)
That's quite a bit for the hosts to know, though.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- deprecated address handling for inbound TCP Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbound ... Richard Draves
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound ... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbo... Matt Crawford
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbound ... Richard Draves
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbound ... Richard Draves
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound ... Bill Manning
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbo... Matt Crawford
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbound ... Brian Zill
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbo... Bill Manning
- RE: deprecated address handling for inbound ... Richard Draves
- Re: deprecated address handling for inbound ... itojun
