At 1:56 PM -0500 11/16/00, Alex Conta wrote: >If flow IDs are used for fast forwarding, without the ability to rewrite >them, it seems to me that a router will not be able to aggregate flows. Alex, That is incorrect. A router can aggregate flows by encapsulation (similar to, but more powerful than, label stacks), and therefore not need to rewrite flow IDs. A system that rewrites flow IDs to do aggregation is unable to efficiently *de*aggregate at the other end of the aggregating path. Steve -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Thomas Eklund
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Francis Dupont
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Hesham Soliman (EPA)
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Michael Thomas
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Michael Thomas
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Hesham Soliman (EPA)
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Steve Deering
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Steve Deering
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Thomas Eklund
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Steve Deering
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Thomas Eklund
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
