I agree.
-- thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Thomas
> Sent: den 16 november 2000 15:06
> To: Francis Dupont
> Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino; Hesham Soliman (EPA); Metzler
> Jochen; Ipng
> (E-Mail)
> Subject: Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label
>
>
> Francis Dupont writes:
> > In your previous mail you wrote:
> >
> > flow label field is not part of AH calculation,
> but as RSVP already
> > requires it to be end-to-end (not hop-by-hop) i
> think we shouldn't
> > rewrite it in transit.
> >
> > => I don't read your argument as you. I'll say it should
> not be rewritten
> > in transit if RSVP is in use. A DiffServ edge router can rewrite it
> > in some situation (it is supposed to know what is RSVP and
> do the right
> > thing).
>
> Why would a diffserv router _want_ to rewrite a flow label?
> It can still rewrite the DSCP if it wants. The only thing
> that I've seen mentioned that could actually take advantage
> in the way you are mentioning is using the flow label for
> MPLS label swapping bits.
>
> Mike
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
