Jim Bound wrote: > > Brian, > > >It still isn't clear to me what the flow label adds to the semantics > >used by existing 5-tuple QOS classifiers. > > First go look at RSVP. Thats one. Although RSVP's use of flowlabel does provide a simpler, not-munged-by-IPsec syntax for expressing a flow's identity, I was under the impression the flowlabel+srcaddr is semantically identical to the 5-tuple. cheers, gja -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Federal Trade Commission...examine emerging ... JIM FLEMING
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Thomas Eklund
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Francis Dupont
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label itojun
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Grenville Armitage
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Francis Dupont
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Michael Thomas
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
