We would have to evaluate the risk (which I guess is traffic analysis)
versus the benefit (ability to provide QOS). That sounds like a
user decision to me.
Brian
Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:40:01PM -0600, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> > OK, I understand. However I would really like to find a solution
> > that works for ESP packets.
>
> The basic idea about ESP is that we do not want to leak information.
> Putting port of it into the flow label is therefore not what we want to do.
>
> Regards,
> -is
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
