> Common where? Yes for firewalls and extranets I agree.   But that is not
the
> same paradigm as two face dns for sitelocal addresses as an
implementation.
> Two different beasts all together.  And the world is not good today to
with
> all the NAT and Tunnels it is horrible we should be careful to not
propogate
> such behavior whenever possible with IPv6.
>

So Jim, in the absense of two-faced DNS how do you think a host should
decide whether it should use site-local for another host, or do you think
using site-local addresses is a bad idea?

PF


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to