> Common where? Yes for firewalls and extranets I agree. But that is not the > same paradigm as two face dns for sitelocal addresses as an implementation. > Two different beasts all together. And the world is not good today to with > all the NAT and Tunnels it is horrible we should be careful to not propogate > such behavior whenever possible with IPv6. > So Jim, in the absense of two-faced DNS how do you think a host should decide whether it should use site-local for another host, or do you think using site-local addresses is a bad idea? PF -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- another renumbering question Paul Francis
- Re: another renumbering question Erik Nordmark
- Re: another renumbering question Robert Elz
- Re: another renumbering question Brian E Carpenter
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- RE: another renumbering question Jim . Bound
- Re: another renumbering question Brian E Carpenter
- RE: another renumbering question Jim . Bound
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- Re: another renumbering question Brian E Carpenter
- RE: another renumbering question Jim . Bound
- RE: another renumbering question Brian Zill
- Re: another renumbering question Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: another renumbering question Robert Elz
- Re: another renumbering question Brian E Carpenter
- Re: another renumbering question Greg Maxwell
- RE: another renumbering question Jim . Bound
- Re: another renumbering question Matt Crawford
- Re: another renumbering question Greg Maxwell
