RE: another renumbering question

[Jim . Bound]

> 
> Firewalls are no reason for a two faced DNS.   Those are 
> forced upon us by
> NAT, because of the re-use of addresses.  With IPv6 we will 
> have no need
> to re-use addresses, and so no reason to bother with two 
> faced DNS (which
> isn't to say that they may not still be people who would 
> prefer to use it).

good point at dec we did this with our net 16 address exactly and two face
dns was not
required.

so the firewall argument is bogus here.

/jim


> 
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------