> > I think there are two motivations for site-locals (that not everybody
> > agrees with):
> > 1. For sites that are isolated i.e. do not have a global prefix.
> > 2. To completely isolate traffic local to a site from
> > site-renumbering events.
>
> Let me add a third motivation - site-local addresses allow for very
> simple security policies or filters. For example the default
> configuration for a file server might be to provide service only to
> site-local clients.
>
=> Another reason, is the ability to discover
some "basic" services within a site. The DNS discovery
draft has recommended the Site-local anycast address
for this purpose.
Hesham
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- Re: another renumbering question Erik Nordmark
- Re: another renumbering question Robert Elz
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- Re: another renumbering question Steve Deering
- RE: another renumbering question Jim . Bound
- RE: another renumbering question Richard Draves
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- RE: another renumbering question Jim . Bound
- Re: another renumbering question Robert Elz
- Re: another renumbering question Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- RE: another renumbering question Samita Chakrabarti
- Re: another renumbering question Robert Elz
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- RE: another renumbering question Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- Re: another renumbering question Steve Deering
- Re: another renumbering question Robert Elz
- Re: another renumbering question Matt Crawford
