> I think there are two motivations for site-locals (that not everybody > agrees with): > 1. For sites that are isolated i.e. do not have a global prefix. > 2. To completely isolate traffic local to a site from > site-renumbering events. Let me add a third motivation - site-local addresses allow for very simple security policies or filters. For example the default configuration for a file server might be to provide service only to site-local clients. Rich -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: another renumbering question Jim . Bound
- Re: another renumbering question Brian E Carpenter
- Re: another renumbering question Greg Maxwell
- Re: another renumbering question Robert Elz
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- Re: another renumbering question Erik Nordmark
- Re: another renumbering question Robert Elz
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- Re: another renumbering question Steve Deering
- RE: another renumbering question Jim . Bound
- Re: another renumbering question Richard Draves
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- RE: another renumbering question Jim . Bound
- Re: another renumbering question Robert Elz
- RE: another renumbering question Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- RE: another renumbering question Samita Chakrabarti
- Re: another renumbering question Robert Elz
- Re: another renumbering question Paul Francis
- RE: another renumbering question Hesham Soliman (ERA)
- Re: another renumbering question Steve Deering
