> 1) Picking numbers at random is easy, but you need a good random > generator, and besides you hit the birthday paradox with 2^^19 entries, > i.e. less than a million. There are way more than 1 million potential > sites. You don't care about the existence of any pair of duplicates -- only about a duplication with a site you eventually expose your private address space to. If everyone picks an unbiased random site id, and you connect in that way to N sites, the chance of a duplication is only around N^2 / 2^19. If you reserved half the space for the number-tsar to allocate uniquely and half for random picks, the chance of hitting a duplication problem (including by connecting to someone with the same site id as your site and connecting to two which chose the same) is not more than about N^2 / 2^18 -- 0.1% if you connect 16 sites -- and far less if you and they are mostly from the unique-numbered camp. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumbering q... Paul Francis
- RE: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Christian Huitema
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Paul Francis
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another ... Erik Nordmark
- RE: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Richard Draves
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Brian Haberman
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Paul Francis
- RE: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Jim . Bound
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another ... Brian Haberman
- RE: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Matt Crawford
- RE: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Nathan Lutchansky
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Paul Francis
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Matt Crawford
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another ... Paul Francis
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Paul Francis
- RE: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Dan Lanciani
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Paul Francis
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another ... Nathan Lutchansky
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Paul Francis
