> Your point is good, but there must be something wrong with your math. No, with my eyes. > Christian's point is (I assume) that with a number space of 2^36, when you > select 2^19 random values you start running into a reasonable risk of two of > those random values being the same. > > Your equation (N^2/2^18) doesn't seem to take into account the 2^36 number, It doesn't. My eye seized upon the wrong number. 2^19 should have been 2^38 throughout. And then making private-space connections to 16 sites gives you a <= one-in-500-million chance of collision, and connecting to 256 sites gives <= one-in-2-million. > Am I not getting something? Yes, presbyopia. Lucky you. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Paul Francis
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Erik Nordmark
- RE: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Richard Draves
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Brian Haberman
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Paul Francis
- RE: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Jim . Bound
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Brian Haberman
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Matt Crawford
- RE: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Nathan Lutchansky
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Paul Francis
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Matt Crawford
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Paul Francis
- RE: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Dan Lanciani
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Paul Francis
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renu... Nathan Lutchansky
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Paul Francis
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Paul Francis
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Nathan Lutchansky
- Re: Wade through the archives (was Re: another renumberi... Nathan Lutchansky
