>>It mandates a guarantee that the label on the IPv6 is authentic before trustin
>>g
>>it. In a link-local scope, where the label is proposed to be carried in the
>>destination header, ESP is mandatory and sufficient.
>>On a wider scope, AH is necessary.
>
>Or it could be bound to the certificate and recreated at the far end.
It could, with the scalability limitation of implicit labeling.
Kais.
>>
>> >
>> >This sounds like it mandates the use of AH, is that correct?
>> >
>> >Best Regards,
>> >Joseph D. Harwood
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
