This sounds like it mandates the use of AH, is that correct? Best Regards, Joseph D. Harwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.vesta-corp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kais Belgaied > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 7:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Internet Draft for explicit security labels in IPv6. > > > Greetings, > > IPv4 had IPSO and CIPSO for labeling of packets assuming we're operating > within the premises of a trusted infrastructure. > IPv6 only has the implicit labeling by having different IPsec SAs convey > different labels. > We think there is a need to have explicit labels in IPv6, whether or not > IPsec is used. > > Please see draft-belgaied-ipv6-lsopt-00.txt > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-belgaied-ipv6-lsopt-00.txt > > > Regards, > Kais. > > >
BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Harwood;Joseph;D. FN:Joseph D. Harwood ORG:Vesta Corporation ADR;WORK:;(408) 838-9434;5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 320;Santa Clara;CA;95054 LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:(408) 838-9434=0D=0A5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 320=0D=0ASanta Clara, = CA 95054 URL: URL:http://www.vesta-corp.com EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20001011T162328Z END:VCARD
