Thomas Narten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This concern is being raised by others, and the registry communities
> have recently begun discussing whether the /35 boundary should be
> changed. See the "Next Steps" slide in the presentation you cited
> earlier
>
>(http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/archive/ripe-39/presentations/ipv6develop/sld017.html),
> for example.
Note also, that if you want to follow these discussions more closely,
you might want to get on the appropriate RIR mailing lists. For
example, see:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/ipv6/index.html
http://www.arin.net/members/mailing.htm (and go to the IPv6 entry
at the bottom).
http://www.apnic.net/wilma-bin/wilma/sig-ipv6 (though it has had
almost no traffic)
Thomas
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
