Hesham,

> > >going back to the original question, based on your 
> > >implementation experience, would hosts use 3041
> > >on a PPP link ? 
> > 
> >     please declare which addressing policy is in your mind, otherwise
> >     we cannot even diagnose...
> > 
>       => Stateless address autoconfigration. If the interface id 
>       as assigned to the host during PPP negotation, would 
>       you still use RFC 3041 later ? 
>       Note, I'm not referring to a /64 assignment or multi-link 
>       subnets, just a simple /128 one. 

current stateless address autoconfiguration does not allow assignment
of a /128. i.e prefixes where the prefix length in the RA is 128.

/ot
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to