Ole,
> > > >going back to the original question, based on your
> > > >implementation experience, would hosts use 3041
> > > >on a PPP link ?
> > >
> > > please declare which addressing policy is in your mind, otherwise
> > > we cannot even diagnose...
> > >
> > => Stateless address autoconfigration. If the interface id
> > as assigned to the host during PPP negotation, would
> > you still use RFC 3041 later ?
> > Note, I'm not referring to a /64 assignment or multi-link
> > subnets, just a simple /128 one.
>
> current stateless address autoconfiguration does not allow assignment
> of a /128. i.e prefixes where the prefix length in the RA is 128.
>
=> Sure, but I wasn't referring to a prefix length of 128 I was referring
to assigning one address to a host on a ppp link. A /128 given to a
host.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
