Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence

[Francis Dupont]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   We have come to the same conclusion that IPV6_V6ONLY should be allowed to
   change only if no bind or connect has been called on that socket.

=> I agree that to change IPV6_V6ONLY on a bound socket (i.e. after a bind
or connect) is silly. I've looked at my code: it forbids to set IPV6_V6ONLY
on a bound socket (not exactly what you ask for).
Conclusion: wording should be very accurate.

Regards

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------