Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence

[Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino]

>I was under the impression that IPV6_V6ONLY after a bind() should just
>plain fail, in which case the problem you describe above wouldn't
>happen.

        that makes sense and eliminates many of scenarios i had in mind.
        thanks.  i still need to go through a lot of cases...

itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------