Compaq implements it the same way.
But as one author NO this should not go in the spec. It is implementation
defined. The only way to force this is to discuss porting assumptions of
the market place. That is at best an art and not a science at this point
with IPv6. If someone does not do it this way and they are the only one
the market will not use their system.
thanks
/jim
"Shout it out G.L.O.R.I.A." (Them [Van Morrison])
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Lori Napoli wrote:
> We have come to the same conclusion that IPV6_V6ONLY should be allowed to
> change only if no bind or connect has been called on that socket. Do the
> RFC authors agree? If so, can we expect the next draft of this RFC to
> have this restriction?
>
>
> Thanks
> Lori
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
