Jinmei, > Just to make it sure, if you mean "accepting IPv4 packets on an > AF_INET6 socket as IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses" by "the model in > 2553", Solaris does not follow the model, AFAIK. Also, NetBSD disable > the model by default. What aspect of this do you believe is not there is Solaris? Solaris by default accepts IPv4 packets on an AF_INET6 socket bound to in6addr_any, so there must be some sutble detail that you're referring to. Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Pekka Savola
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Francis Dupont
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the ... JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Francis Dupont
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the ... Markku Savela
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Francis Dupont
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the ... Pekka Savola
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Francis Dupont
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Erik Nordmark
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the ... Pekka Savola
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Erik Nordmark
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Pekka Savola
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Francis Dupont
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the ... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- RE: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Brian Zill
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Mauro Tortonesi
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way t... Mauro Tortonesi
