RE: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence

[Dave Thaler]

Jim Bound:
> we did suggest that there be no default for v6only (in fact I
suggested
> it) and no one on either side wanted that.  thinking was even if one
did
> not get their choice then its better to have default for the users.

Actually I suggested it as well, so I wouldn't have a problem with no
default.  Anyone who wants portable apps would just always set the
option, no problem.

-Dave
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------