On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Francis Dupont wrote: > => you can use it with the V6ONLY stuff. yes, but on rfc2553-compliant system you cannot have both an AF_INET and an AF_INET6 socket listening on the same port. > => this is the standard way but with the V6ONLY way you can use the > single socket (my favorite) or the socket per IP version (Itojun's > favorite). The user shall choice his own favorite or the one which > matches the application constraints. the user can't choose anything! if he wants to listen both ipv4 and ipv6 traffic, he has to use an AF_INET6 socket with V6ONLY turned off. no other choice. -- Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem... Mauro Tortonesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ferrara Linux User Group http://www.ferrara.linux.it Project6 - IPv6 for Linux http://project6.ferrara.linux.it -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Brian Zill
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Mauro Tortonesi
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Mauro Tortonesi
- RE: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Dave Thaler
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Tim Hartrick
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to... Erik Nordmark
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Mauro Tortonesi
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Mauro Tortonesi
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- RE: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Mauro Tortonesi
- RE: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Christian Huitema
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jim Bound
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to... David Terrell
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jim Bound
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Jim Bound
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to... Mauro Tortonesi
- Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF i... Pekka Savola
