and it should not but an implementation that does not permit this is not
optimal. we cannot force this behavior on implementors either. thats why
it is not in 2553.
/jim
"Shout it out G.L.O.R.I.A." (Them [Van Morrison])
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
>
> >> => you can use it with the V6ONLY stuff.
> >yes, but on rfc2553-compliant system you cannot have both an AF_INET
> >and an AF_INET6 socket listening on the same port.
>
> (just a picky comment) RFC2553 does not talk about the behavior
> when try to bind(2) to both :: and 0.0.0.0 on the same port. some
> systems reject bind(2) to 0.0.0.0, some does not.
>
> itojun
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
