Robert Elz writes: > before it has even had a reasonable chance to be tested We're saying ``deployment will be a disaster, and here's why.'' You're saying ``let's deploy it and see what happens.'' That's unacceptable. A6 and DNAME need to be killed _before_ people start relying on them. ---Dan -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda Robert Elz
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda Robert Elz
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda itojun
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda Robert Elz
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda itojun
- obstacles to renumbering [Re: Joint DNSEXT &a... D. J. Bernstein
- obstacles to renumbering [Re: Joint DNSEXT & ... Pekka Savola
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda Robert Elz
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda Masataka Ohta
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda Robert Elz
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda Masataka Ohta
- Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda Matt Crawford
- RE: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda Tony Hain
- RE: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda David R. Conrad
