One last comment - you and I are not agreeing on the urgency of this.
If we don't pick AAAA or A6 right now, we cannot deploy IPv6 NS
records and/or IPv6 MX records, we cannot convince gTLDs/ccTLDs to
accept IPv6 NS record registrations. The deadline for picking them up
is at the London IETF. We wanted the choice like a couple of years ago.
We operate commercial IPv6 backbone and selling services to customers
since the summer of 1999. And we don't have an official choice of
IPv6 DNS records? The situation is like a very very bad joke.
We cannot wait forever. This way we can never deploy IPv6.
(btw, I'm using no IPv4 from my laptop as I type this!)
I appreciate your intent to do the analysis, but I cannot wait forever.
We did the analysis and test operations, and the result is in my draft.
I did my homework.
> | So in your world unanswered questions are called "FUD"?
>No, just unanswered questions whose point is to remain unanswered, and
>thus just raise the fear of the unknown.
The open questions in my drafts are intended to be answered, or get
the consensus among people. This is not intended to be left
ununsewered (What suggested you like that? Did I tell you so?
how can can you assert like that without checking with me?).
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
