Hi Brian, > I think the WG needs to decide once and for all whether the > flow label is > a) a CATNIP or MPLS-like routing handle > or b) a QOS hint for intserv only > or c) a QOS hint for intserv and diffserv > or d) a waste of bits > > We can get back to the details once we have a consensus on this. I prefer c, but wouldn't mind it being simplified down to "A QoS hint." John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Bob Hinden
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian Haberman
- Re: Higher level question about flow label john . loughney
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Tim Chown
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Francis Dupont
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Bob Hinden
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Francis Dupont
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Higher level question about flow label Thomas Eklund
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
