Re: Higher level question about flow label

[Tim Chown]

On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Francis Dupont wrote:

>  In your previous mail you wrote:
> 
>    I think the WG needs to decide once and for all whether the flow label is
>       a) a CATNIP or MPLS-like routing handle 
>    or b) a QOS hint for intserv only
>    or c) a QOS hint for intserv and diffserv
>    or d) a waste of bits
>    
> => I vote for b)

So would you vote to mandate that the field is non-mutable in transit too?

tim

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------