Yes I would as a note. I want what we orginally called for and to make
sure nothing breaks RSVPv6 which uses the flowlabel too.
/jim
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Tim Chown wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Francis Dupont wrote:
>
> > In your previous mail you wrote:
> >
> > I think the WG needs to decide once and for all whether the flow label is
> > a) a CATNIP or MPLS-like routing handle
> > or b) a QOS hint for intserv only
> > or c) a QOS hint for intserv and diffserv
> > or d) a waste of bits
> >
> > => I vote for b)
>
> So would you vote to mandate that the field is non-mutable in transit too?
>
> tim
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
