Tony Hain wrote: > > [...]The > only one that may care is the destination host, could you please clarify/elaborate? > so trying to invert > the non-transitive relationship between the flow label and QoS models > is simply wrong. could you please clarify/elaborate? > [...] while the fact > that there is no single definition of QoS across administrative domains > means that it is impossible to use any single set of bits to create > that definition. > > Tony could you please clarify/elaborate? Thanks, Alex
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Michael Thomas
- RE: Higher level question about flow label jarno . rajahalme
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Steve Blake
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Bob Hinden
- RE: Higher level question about flow label Tony Hain
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Higher level question about flow label Tony Hain
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Michael Thomas
- RE: Higher level question about flow label Tony Hain
- RE: Higher level question about flow label Tony Hain
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Steve Blake
- RE: Higher level question about flow label Tony Hain
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature