Steve Blake wrote: > > > You're forcing the use of a subset of Diffserv on everybody. > > > > One MUST be able to use Diffserv with IPv6, at a not lesser extent than > > Intserv with IPv6. > > > > This is even more so, when it does not cost anything, or much, as you > > seemed to agree at one point. > > IPv6 supports Diffserv today in precisely the same way that IPv4 does. Indeed. The proposal on the table is to give IPv6 an edge in the case of ESP packets. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: Higher level question about flow label jarno . rajahalme
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Michael Thomas
- RE: Higher level question about flow label jarno . rajahalme
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Steve Blake
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Bob Hinden
- RE: Higher level question about flow label Tony Hain
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Higher level question about flow label Tony Hain
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Higher level question about flow label Michael Thomas
- RE: Higher level question about flow label Tony Hain
