Francis Dupont wrote: > > What Alex and I came here to discuss was doing better than > that with IPv6. > > => I understand but I shan't support the c) option until the 5-tuple > re-classifier monster is killed. > > Regards > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] In fact the c) option is not using the 5-tuple classifier. So I do not understand why you link them together. But the M-F Diffserv classifier is not different than the Intserv data path classifier. It uses the same fields, with the same type of capability to represent range of values by wildcarding some of the bits, or an entire field. How come you do not have a problem with the Intserv classifier? Regards, Alex
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Robert Elz
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Robert Elz
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Michael Thomas
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Robert Elz
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Robert Elz
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Michael Thomas
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature