In your previous mail you wrote: There was very little direct reaction to my previous message (Brian's need to think about it more was about it), but there seems to be some suggestion that an extra header would be too heavyweight, and so be too slow to handle. => in fact I'd like this idea, this is a good solution but I am afraid that this is a good solution of a wrong problem... Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Michael Thomas
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Robert Elz
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Francis Dupont
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Robert Elz
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Michael Thomas
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Alex Conta
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Robert Elz
- Re: a), b), c), d), or e) Brian E Carpenter
