> I am quite concerned about the fact that at this moment the entire > IPv6 space is allocated, with no experimental, or reserved space for > future development. i don't perceive that this is at all the case. almost no space has been allocated, O(100) /35s. the current drafts have iana considerations asking that they only allocate from 001/3. what am i missing here randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Pekka Savola
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Erik Nordmark
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addres... Matt Crawford
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Randy Bush
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Randy Bush
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Randy Bush
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Randy Bush
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Thomas Narten
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Thomas Narten
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Alex Conta
