Randy Bush wrote: > > > > > Could you elaborate on the exact reasons? > > because we remember implementations and protocols that had A, B, and C hard > coded and how hard it was getting cidr deployed. > [...] Thanks. Yours and Thomas's were useful clarifications.
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Matt Crawford
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Randy Bush
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Randy Bush
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Randy Bush
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Randy Bush
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Thomas Narten
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Thomas Narten
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Alex Conta
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Thomas Narten
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... itojun
- Question about draft-ietf-ngtrans-introduction... Chae-yong Chong
- RE: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Christian Huitema
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing... Thomas Narten
- RE: W.G. Last Call on "IP Version 6 Addressing Arch... Christian Huitema
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature