>>   Unassigned:
>> 
>>   6/8 + 57/512 (2.5521177519070384759753095557382e+38
>> +                                 3.788299787987010237775850121799e+37
>> of addresses) 
>>                This is the remaining of the address space, which has not
>> been assigned.

        for implementers, it needs to be known that the unassigned region is
        unicast addresses, not just "unassigned".
        otherwise, implemnters cannot implement the code to handle these
        "future allocation" addresses.  in my understanding this is the
        main reason for the wording change between RFC and i-d.

itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to