> See RFC 2908.
At least that reference is missing from the document.
But I see a mismatch between the draft and RFC 2908 since the latter
seems to say that an application can request multicast addresses with
a particular lifetime. With the uni-based addresses there can be no
way for the application to request a lifetime.
How can this be resolved?
> > Is the intent that e.g. if the prefixes are advertised with a 1 day
> valid
> > lifetime, that an implementation MUST NOT use multicast addresses
> derived
> > from those prefixes in SDP advertisements that end beyond 1 day ahead?
>
> Yes.
If that is indeed the WG consensus then this should be made very clear
in the draft.
Erik
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
