Erik, Erik Nordmark wrote: > > > See RFC 2908. > > At least that reference is missing from the document. > But I see a mismatch between the draft and RFC 2908 since the latter > seems to say that an application can request multicast addresses with > a particular lifetime. With the uni-based addresses there can be no > way for the application to request a lifetime. > How can this be resolved?
Well, the first thing is to actually reference 2908 in the doc. :) I will make sure that 2908 is part of a section describing the changes between v4 and v6 mcast allocation. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
