> So, since I am the common denominator between the two drafts, I must > claim responsibility. The SSM overview draft should state that > FF3x::/32 is the SSM range for IPv6.
But the uni-based document says that everything with a plen=0 is an SSM address, right? So the documents wouldn't be quite consistent even if SSM says FF3X::/32. Erik -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
