Thomas Narten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So, since I am the common denominator between the two drafts, I must > > claim responsibility. The SSM overview draft should state that > > FF3x::/32 is the SSM range for IPv6.
> Either I still don't get it, or this isn't true either. Only if plen > == 0 is the address an SSM one. So you can't say that ff3x::/32 is the > SSM range, because the plen field is in the last octet of that range. I clearly didn't get it above; I agree that FF3x::/32 would be the SSM range. Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
