Erik Nordmark wrote:
> So NUD does a fine job of recovering from hosts changing their link-layer
> address and sooner or later detecting that a router is dead. But if the goal
> is to quickly fail over between a set of routers then VRRP make more sense.
I agree with your assessment. Having VRRP functionality accomplishes
more than simply depending on NUD. However, the current VRRP spec
has no support whatsoever for IPv6. In addition, there may be issues
that need to be addressed where VRRP, as defined for IPv4, causes
operational problems in IPv6 (DAD for instance).
Anyone in VRRP looking at VRRPv6???
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
