Brian, >I agree with your assessment. Having VRRP functionality accomplishes >more than simply depending on NUD. However, the current VRRP spec >has no support whatsoever for IPv6. In addition, there may be issues >that need to be addressed where VRRP, as defined for IPv4, causes >operational problems in IPv6 (DAD for instance). > >Anyone in VRRP looking at VRRPv6???
Other than some discussion, there hasn't been any work done on an IPv6 version of VRRP. It is within the scope of the VRRP w.g., so if there was sufficient interest (i.e., someone wanted to write a draft), it could be done there. Also, there is still time to request a meeting slot for VRRP to meet in Salt Lake City. Are you interested in working on this? I have the nroff for the current version of VRRP. I don't think it would be too hard to adapt it to IPv6. Bob -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
