Hi Francis, Thanks for the summary. I think if what you wrote was added to the next version of the draft, it would be very good.
thanks, John > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Francis Dupont [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 December, 2001 16:46 > To: Loughney John (NRC/Helsinki) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Quick comments on draft-wasserman-3gpp-advice-00.txt > > > In your previous mail you wrote: > > It seems that there are 3 main recommendations made in the > document: > > 1. Specify that multiple prefixes may be assigned to each > primary PDP context, > > => IMHO this is more a problem of primary/secondary vs. > single IPv6 link. > But as there is no primary prefix and secondary PDP contexts > are for QoS > I agree with this recommendations. > > 2. Require that a given prefix must not be > assigned to more > than one primary PDP context, and > > => if this is not done IP routing at the GGSN is simply impossible > (GGSN must be an IP router so there is no real choice). > > 3. Allow 3GPP nodes to use multiple identifiers > within those > prefixes, including randomly generated identifiers. > > => support of randomly generated identifiers shall become mandatory > for address allocation schemes. > > Regards > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
