Thanks, John.
This seems like a good idea. We will discuss it in the design team. Margaret At 06:53 AM 11/26/01 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi all, > >I have some very general comments on the document. They are mostly >editorial / layout type of comments. > >It seems that there are 3 main recommendations made in the document: > > 1. Specify that multiple prefixes may be assigned to each > primary PDP context, > > 2. Require that a given prefix must not be assigned to more > than one primary PDP context, and > > 3. Allow 3GPP nodes to use multiple identifiers within those > prefixes, including randomly generated identifiers. > >It might be useful for each recommendation to have some subsections such >as: > > - Pros > > - Cons > > - Impact upon architecture / implementation > >I think that by more clearly listing what advantages & disadvantages >the recommendations bring, it will be easier to address the recommendations >(no pun intended). The 3rd bullet (Impact ...) is a purely practical >point - as some service providers / manufacturers may be dis-inclined >to support the changes unless they are relatively modest. Additionally, >if the changes are minor, it might be possible for service providers >to update their networks ... > >I do think you have most all of the text currently in the document, >but a slight reformating would help to bring out the issues. > >best regards, >John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
